Waist-to-Hip Ratio Calculator
Assess Body Fat Distribution & Health Risk — WHO Classification
Understanding Waist-to-Hip Ratio
What Does WHR Measure?
The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is a simple measurement that compares the circumference of your waist to the circumference of your hips. It is calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. The resulting number provides a snapshot of how body fat is distributed across your torso.
Unlike BMI, which estimates total body fatness based on weight and height, WHR specifically assesses where fat is stored. This distinction is clinically important because the location of fat deposits has a significant impact on health risk, independent of total body weight.
Visceral vs. Subcutaneous Fat
Body fat is stored in two primary depots:
- Subcutaneous fat is stored directly beneath the skin. It is the fat you can pinch on your arms, thighs, and hips. While excess subcutaneous fat contributes to overall obesity, it is metabolically less dangerous than visceral fat.
- Visceral fat (also called intra-abdominal fat) is stored deep within the abdominal cavity, surrounding vital organs including the liver, pancreas, and intestines. Visceral fat is metabolically active — it releases inflammatory cytokines, free fatty acids, and hormones that disrupt insulin signaling, raise blood pressure, and promote atherosclerosis.
A high WHR indicates a disproportionate amount of abdominal (and likely visceral) fat, which is why it serves as a proxy marker for cardiometabolic risk.
Metabolic Risk Connection
The link between central adiposity and metabolic disease has been established through decades of research. A high WHR is independently associated with:
- Increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Coronary heart disease and myocardial infarction
- Hypertension
- Dyslipidemia (elevated triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol)
- Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome
- Stroke
- Increased all-cause mortality
The World Health Organization has recognized WHR as a valuable tool for identifying individuals at elevated cardiometabolic risk and recommends its use alongside BMI for a more comprehensive assessment of obesity-related health risks.
How to Measure Correctly
Step-by-Step Waist Measurement
- Stand upright with your arms at your sides and your feet together.
- Remove or lift any clothing that covers the area between your ribs and hips.
- Locate the narrowest part of your torso, typically the midpoint between the bottom of your lowest rib and the top of your hip bone (iliac crest). This is usually at or just above the level of the belly button.
- Wrap a flexible, non-stretchy measuring tape around this point, ensuring the tape is level and parallel to the floor all the way around.
- The tape should be snug against the skin but should not compress the underlying tissue.
- Take the reading at the end of a normal exhale (do not suck in your stomach).
- Record the measurement to the nearest half-centimeter or quarter-inch.
Step-by-Step Hip Measurement
- Stand upright with your feet together.
- Wrap the measuring tape around the widest part of your buttocks and hips.
- Ensure the tape is level and parallel to the floor. It can help to look in a mirror from the side, or have someone assist you.
- The tape should be snug but not tight.
- Record the measurement to the nearest half-centimeter or quarter-inch.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Measuring over clothing: Even thin fabric can add 1–2 cm to the measurement. Always measure against bare skin.
- Using a stretched or twisted tape: Old, worn-out measuring tapes can stretch and produce inaccurate readings. Check that the tape is flat and untwisted all the way around.
- Holding your breath or flexing: Sucking in your stomach or tensing your abdominal muscles will artificially reduce the waist measurement. Breathe normally and relax.
- Measuring at the wrong location: The waist measurement should be taken at the narrowest point of the torso, not at the belt line (which is often lower).
- Inconsistent timing: Measurements can vary throughout the day due to meals, hydration, and bloating. For tracking changes over time, measure at the same time of day under the same conditions.
When to Measure
For the most consistent results, measure first thing in the morning before eating or drinking, after emptying your bladder. If you are tracking changes over time, take measurements at the same time of day, on the same day of the week, using the same technique each time. Record your results so you can monitor trends rather than reacting to any single measurement.
WHR vs BMI
Why WHR Can Be More Informative
Body Mass Index (BMI) is calculated using weight and height (BMI = kg/m²) and classifies individuals as underweight, normal weight, overweight, or obese. While BMI is a useful population-level screening tool, it has significant limitations as an individual health indicator:
- BMI does not distinguish between fat mass and lean mass. A muscular athlete may have a "overweight" BMI despite having low body fat.
- BMI does not indicate where fat is stored. Two people with the same BMI can have very different fat distribution patterns and very different health risks.
- BMI may underestimate health risk in people who carry excess abdominal fat but have normal total body weight (sometimes called "metabolically obese, normal weight" or "skinny fat").
WHR addresses these gaps by directly measuring fat distribution. A person with a normal BMI but high WHR may be at greater cardiovascular risk than someone with an elevated BMI but low WHR (whose weight comes primarily from muscle or lower-body fat).
The INTERHEART Study
One of the most influential studies supporting the superiority of WHR over BMI was the INTERHEART study (Yusuf et al., 2005), a massive case-control study involving 27,098 participants from 52 countries across every inhabited continent.
Key findings:
- WHR showed a graded and highly significant association with myocardial infarction (heart attack) risk across all populations, ethnic groups, and both sexes.
- The top quintile of WHR had approximately a 2.5-fold increased risk of heart attack compared to the lowest quintile.
- WHR was a stronger predictor of heart attack than BMI in every region and ethnic group studied.
- The relationship between WHR and myocardial infarction was independent of other traditional risk factors including smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and lipid levels.
- BMI showed a much weaker and less consistent association with heart attack risk across different populations.
The INTERHEART study concluded that WHR should be considered a better measure of obesity-related cardiovascular risk than BMI and recommended its routine use in clinical risk assessment.
Limitations of Each Measure
BMI limitations:
- Cannot distinguish fat from muscle, bone, or water
- Same thresholds applied regardless of age, sex, or ethnicity may be inappropriate
- Does not capture fat distribution or visceral fat
WHR limitations:
- Does not measure total body fat — a person can have a normal WHR but still carry excess overall body fat
- Accuracy depends on correct measurement technique
- Can be affected by hip anatomy (pelvic width), which varies by sex and ethnicity
- Does not change proportionally with uniform weight gain or loss — if waist and hips increase equally, the ratio stays the same
Best practice: Use BMI and WHR together, along with waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio, for a more complete assessment of obesity-related health risk.
Reducing Abdominal Fat
Exercise: Cardio + Resistance Training
Both aerobic exercise and resistance training have been shown to reduce visceral abdominal fat. For the most effective results, combine both types:
- Aerobic exercise: Moderate-intensity cardio (brisk walking, cycling, swimming) for at least 150 minutes per week, or vigorous-intensity cardio (running, HIIT) for at least 75 minutes per week. Studies show that aerobic exercise preferentially reduces visceral fat even when total body weight does not change significantly.
- Resistance training: Strength training at least 2 days per week helps build and preserve lean muscle mass, which increases resting metabolic rate. Compound movements (squats, deadlifts, rows, presses) engage large muscle groups and produce the greatest metabolic benefit.
- High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT): Short bursts of intense effort alternating with recovery periods have been shown to be particularly effective at reducing abdominal and visceral fat in a shorter time commitment than steady-state cardio.
Important: Spot reduction (targeting fat loss in a specific area through exercises like crunches) is a myth. Abdominal exercises strengthen core muscles but do not preferentially burn belly fat. Fat loss occurs systemically through overall caloric deficit and metabolic changes.
Dietary Changes
Dietary modifications that are most effective for reducing abdominal fat include:
- Reduce refined carbohydrates and added sugars: High sugar intake, especially from sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods, is strongly associated with increased visceral fat accumulation. Fructose in particular is metabolized by the liver and promotes hepatic and visceral fat deposition.
- Increase protein intake: Higher protein diets (25–30% of total calories) promote satiety, preserve lean muscle mass during weight loss, and may reduce abdominal fat accumulation. Good sources include lean meats, fish, eggs, legumes, and dairy.
- Prioritize fiber: Soluble fiber (found in oats, beans, flaxseeds, and many fruits and vegetables) slows digestion, improves blood sugar control, and has been specifically associated with reduced visceral fat. An increase of just 10 grams of soluble fiber per day has been linked to a 3.7% decrease in visceral fat over 5 years.
- Choose healthy fats: Replace saturated and trans fats with monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (olive oil, avocado, nuts, fatty fish). Mediterranean-style diets rich in these fats have been associated with less abdominal fat accumulation.
- Limit alcohol: Excess alcohol consumption promotes visceral fat storage ("beer belly" effect). Moderate consumption is defined as up to 1 drink per day for women and up to 2 for men.
Stress Management: The Cortisol Connection
Chronic psychological stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to sustained elevation of cortisol, the body's primary stress hormone. Elevated cortisol has been directly linked to increased visceral fat deposition through several mechanisms:
- Cortisol promotes the conversion of pre-adipocytes into mature fat cells in the visceral compartment
- It increases appetite and cravings for high-calorie, high-sugar foods
- It promotes insulin resistance, which favors fat storage
- Visceral fat tissue has a higher density of cortisol receptors than subcutaneous fat
Evidence-based strategies for managing stress include mindfulness meditation, deep breathing exercises, yoga, regular physical activity, adequate social connection, cognitive behavioral techniques, and professional counseling when needed.
Sleep: An Underappreciated Factor
Sleep quality and duration have a significant impact on abdominal fat accumulation:
- Adults who sleep fewer than 5–6 hours per night have been shown to accumulate significantly more visceral fat over time compared to those sleeping 7–8 hours.
- Sleep deprivation increases ghrelin (hunger hormone) and decreases leptin (satiety hormone), promoting overeating.
- Poor sleep disrupts cortisol rhythms, contributing to the stress-cortisol-visceral fat cycle described above.
- Sleep apnea, which is both a cause and consequence of visceral obesity, further disrupts metabolic health.
Recommendation: Aim for 7–9 hours of quality sleep per night. Maintain a consistent sleep schedule, limit screen time before bed, keep your bedroom cool and dark, and address sleep disorders such as sleep apnea with your healthcare provider.
Frequently Asked Questions
According to the World Health Organization, a healthy waist-to-hip ratio is 0.90 or lower for men and 0.85 or lower for women. Values below these thresholds indicate that body fat is distributed more toward the hips and thighs (pear shape), which is associated with lower cardiovascular and metabolic risk. Ratios above these cutoffs suggest a higher proportion of abdominal fat (apple shape) and are associated with increased risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and other cardiometabolic conditions. However, these thresholds are general guidelines — individual risk depends on many factors including age, ethnicity, overall body composition, and other health markers.
For the waist, stand upright and relaxed, then measure at the narrowest point of your torso, typically midway between the lowest rib and the top of the hip bone (iliac crest). This is usually at or just above the belly button. Use a flexible, non-stretchy tape measure held snug against bare skin, level with the floor. Take the measurement at the end of a normal exhale — do not suck in your stomach.
For the hips, stand with feet together and measure around the widest part of your buttocks and hips, keeping the tape level. It helps to look in a side mirror or have someone assist you.
For both measurements: use the same tape measure, measure against bare skin (not over clothing), take each measurement two to three times, and use the average. For tracking changes over time, measure at the same time of day under the same conditions.
WHR and BMI measure different things, and each has strengths and limitations. BMI estimates total body fatness based on weight and height but cannot distinguish between fat and muscle or indicate where fat is stored. WHR specifically measures fat distribution, which is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk in many studies. The landmark INTERHEART study (27,098 participants across 52 countries) found that WHR was a significantly better predictor of heart attack risk than BMI across all ethnicities and both sexes. However, WHR does not measure total body fat — a person can have a normal WHR but still be overweight. For the most comprehensive assessment, healthcare professionals recommend using BMI and WHR together, along with waist circumference, as no single measurement captures the full picture.
Yes. WHR can change with changes in body composition. Reducing abdominal fat through a combination of regular aerobic exercise, resistance training, dietary improvements (reducing refined sugars, increasing fiber and protein), stress management, and adequate sleep can lower your WHR over time. Research shows that lifestyle interventions can meaningfully reduce waist circumference and improve the WHR, even when overall body weight does not change dramatically. This is because exercise and dietary changes can preferentially reduce visceral fat. Hormonal changes (such as menopause in women or declining testosterone in men) can also shift fat distribution and affect WHR, making ongoing monitoring important.
These terms describe two common patterns of body fat distribution. An apple-shaped body carries more weight around the midsection (abdomen), resulting in a higher waist-to-hip ratio. This pattern is more common in men and is associated with higher levels of visceral fat, which surrounds internal organs and is linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and certain cancers. A pear-shaped body carries more weight in the hips, buttocks, and thighs, resulting in a lower waist-to-hip ratio. This pattern is more common in pre-menopausal women and is generally associated with lower cardiometabolic risk, as the fat stored in these areas tends to be subcutaneous rather than visceral. However, both body shapes can be associated with health risks when overall body fat is excessive.
For general health monitoring, measuring once a month is sufficient to track meaningful changes without being affected by day-to-day fluctuations. If you are actively trying to reduce your WHR through exercise and dietary changes, measuring every two to four weeks provides a good balance between tracking progress and allowing enough time for detectable changes to occur. Always measure under consistent conditions — same time of day, same technique, same tape measure — to ensure accurate comparisons over time. It is more useful to focus on trends over several measurements than to react to any single reading, as measurements can vary by 1–2 cm due to factors like meals, hydration, time of day, and bloating.
Medical Disclaimer
This Waist-to-Hip Ratio Calculator is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. WHR is one of several anthropometric measurements used to estimate health risk and should be interpreted in the context of a comprehensive health assessment by a qualified healthcare professional. Risk thresholds may vary based on age, ethnicity, and individual health factors. All calculations are performed in your browser — no personal data is stored on our servers or shared with any third party.
References
- World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation. Geneva: WHO; 2008. WHO
- Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study (INTERHEART). Lancet. 2005;366(9497):1640-1649. PubMed
- Czernichow S, Kengne AP, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Batty GD. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk? Evidence from an individual-participant meta-analysis of 82,864 participants from nine cohort studies. Obes Rev. 2011;12(9):680-687. PubMed
- Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012;13(3):275-286. PubMed
